Click on the following link to see photos of New England Patriots players as they prepare for practice:
https://www.masslive.com/sports/2023/05/mike-vrabel-eager-to-join-murderers-row-in-patriots-hall-of-fame.html
New England Patriots linebackers, from left, Tedy Bruschi, Mike Vrabel and Larry Izzo stretch during football practice in Foxborough, Mass., Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008
As you see, the photo shows Patriots players doing static stretches. What could be the rationale for football players to perform static stretches before a football practice? After all, a football practice consists of mainly dynamic actions—even explosive power actions.
I understand that at some times, in some cases, a static stretch before dynamic exercises may help. For example, someone with a patellofemoral syndrome might want to lower the tonus of the tensor fascia lata and gluteus medius before running or doing squats. (Of course, such a way of managing this problem is only temporary because it does not address the root cause of the excessive tension of these muscles.) But both photos show at least three Patriots players doing the same stretches. Do they all have the same neuromuscular disorder that can be temporarily fixed by a static stretch? If so, don’t their PTs know better, more permanent methods of treating it? There are methods of reducing excessive muscle tension with simple manipulations and easy exercises, so the athletes do not have to begin practice with static stretches and all their drawbacks. Why not use those methods? Is it because others prepare for practice in the same way? Or because the team wins most of the time, so why change anything? Yes, one can do this and still win, and keep on winning. The strength of talent combined with hard work can overcome much… but why not make it easier on oneself?
To sum it up: I am interested in coach Bill Belichick’s rationale for having his football players do static stretches before practice. He is one of the best coaches in the NFL, so I assume he doesn’t do things without knowing why.
